Disabled Borrowers

Published — March 4, 2011 Updated — May 19, 2014 at 12:19 pm ET

After a disabled borrower’s six-year ordeal, bureaucracy finally forgives student loan

Introduction

After six years battling to persuade the Education Department that she was too disabled to work again, the government finally has forgiven the student debt of disabled former police officer Tina Brooks. She was featured in a Feb. 13 story about the government’s broken program for forgiving the federal student loans of borrowers who become seriously disabled.

Brooks fractured her spine while training for bicycle patrol. The Education Department repeatedly had denied her applications for loan forgiveness, and more than $4,000 in interest had accrued on her debt — even though Social Security had found that she was fully disabled in 2006.

“I feel like this giant weight has been taken off my shoulders,” Brooks said. “Six years of filling out the forms and hoping it was the right thing and cringing every time I would hear I needed more information and had to go crawling back to my doctor.”

Although borrowers who develop severe and lasting disabilities are legally entitled to get federal student loans forgiven, a joint investigation by ProPublica and the Center for Public Integrity found that many borrowers have been denied for unclear reasons, and many others have simply given up.

Following the story, the Education Department pledged to overhaul the program and said it will propose new regulations this summer to make the system work better for disabled borrowers.

For Brooks, the approval of her loan discharge application comes just before the deferments she had received for economic hardship were scheduled to run out.

She said she didn’t know how she would have paid the $47,500 that she owed on her loans and had been preparing for another struggle with Education Department bureaucracy when she found out last weekend that her debt had been forgiven.

“No more fighting. No more battling that windmill,” Brooks said. “I am so relieved.”

Read more in Inequality, Opportunity and Poverty

Share this article

Join the conversation

Show Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments